CITATIONS

1. Blanck, P., Wilichowski, A., Schmeling, J. “Disability Civil Rights Law And Policy: Accessible Courtroom Technology”. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 12:825, 2004.
Link

 

2. Hussin, N. Schofield, D. Shalaby, M.T. “Visualising Information: Evidence Analysis fro Computer-Generated Animation (CGA)”. Nottingham Univ., UK; This paper appears in Information Visualisation, 2004, IV 2004, Proceedings, Eighth International Conference on, Publication Date: 14-16 July 2004, On pages: 903-908.
Link

 

3. Feigenson, Neal. “Too Real? The Future Of Virtural Reality Evidence”. Law & Policy, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 271, April 2006.
Link 

 

4. Lederer, Fredric I.”The Potential Use Of Courtroom Technology In Major Terrorism Cases”.2003.
Link

 

5. Joo, Thomas W. “Who Watches The Watchers? The Securities Investor Protection Act, Investor Confidence, And The Subsidization Of Failure”. Southern California Law Review, Vol 72:1071-1149, 1999.
Link

 

6. USA Today, DNA Type in Peterson Hearing Becoming Mainstream Justice Tool, (November 3, 2003).
Link

 

7. CBS News, Peterson Case Focus Back on DNA, (November 23, 2006).
Link

 

8. Jim Wasserman, DNA Goes Under Microscope in Court Peterson Murder Trial Focuses on Meaning of Mitochondria, MSNBC.com, (November 3, 2003)
Link

 

9. The University of Florida, Fredric G. Levin College of Law, Evidence, Fall 2005, Notes: 01, Pedro A. Malavet.
Link

 

10. October 2002 New Book List.
Link

 

11. Robert P. Mosteller, Evidence History the New Trace Evidence, and Rumbling in the Future of Proof, 3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. (2006).
Link

 

12. Erin E. Kenneally, Gatekeeping Out of the Box: Open Source Software as a Mechanism to Assess Reliability for Digital Evidence, 6 Va. J.L. & Tech 13 (2001).
Link

 

13. Howard L. Nations, Nations’ Predicates: Table of Authorities—Treatises–Miscellaneous”.
Link

 

14. Civil Litigation Management Manual, Guidelines for Ensuring Fair and Effective Court-Annexed ADR: Attributes of a Well-Functioning ADR Program and Ethical Principles for ADR Neutrals, Report of the ADR Task Force of the Court Administration and Case Management Committee, 451 (December 1997).
Link

 

15. State v. Stewart, 2002, Minnesota, C6-01-177.
Link

 

16. Mark Martin, Tobacco Firms Suing State to End Ads- Companies Say Anti-Smoking Funds Misused, San Francisco Chronicle (April 3, 2003).
Link

 

17. Jeffrey R. Gleit, Note: The Report of the Demise of the D’Oench Doctrine Have Been Greatly Exaggerated: The Continuing Coexistence of the D’Oench Doctrine and Section 1823(E), 28 Hofstra L Rev 225 (2000).
Link